HOME > Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ >Áú¹®°ú ÀÀ´ä
À̸§
European
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ
2019³â 12¿ù 20ÀÏ 09½Ã 27ºÐ
ÆÄÀÏ
ÀÚ·á ¹Ìµî·Ï
European countries, the Swedish
There is
Á߰赿Æ÷ÀåÀÌ»ç
some criticism of the privatised job council system, much of which centres on the idea that agencies don¡¯t do anything
·¹Çø®Ä«¿©¼ºÁö°©
=·¹Çø®Ä«¿©¼ºÁö°©
to help raise skill levels of employees not facing
±ºÆ÷¾ÆÆÄÆ®ÀÌ»ç
layoffs, since these councils only work with people who have
²Äµ¥°¡¸£¼Û¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
=²Äµ¥°¡¸£¼Û¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
lost, or are about to lose, their jobs. Additionally, it¡¯s quite a bit harder to place job seekers who haven¡¯t recently been in the workforce, which generally means that skilled
µð½ºÄù¾îµå¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
=µð½ºÄù¾îµå¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù
workers partnering with the job security councils have a higher chance of getting a new position. But, compared to other European countries, the Swedish system is efficient and has garnered attention internationally. The closest equivalent to the Swedish system is Germany¡¯s Transferma©¬nahmen, or ¡®transfer measures¡¯, in which support for laid-off workers is partly financed by the employer and partly by the state. However, this only applies to large companies. And in general,
¼ººÏÀϹÝÀÌ»ç
current programmes in Europe more commonly focus on avoiding layoffs altogether, such as cuts in pay or working hours. In most countries, there exists no additional support for laid-off workers apart from state-run
´ä·Ê¶±
=´ä·ÊÇ° ´ä·Ê¶± Çà»ç¶± ±îÄ¡¶±
schemes. This applies in particular to the French system, but also to Belgium and the Netherlands, for example.